Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X