Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 4010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-405
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €299.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4010
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Shimano 20 Stella, 6000 HG, SWC, left and right hand, Salzwasser Angelrolle, Front Drag, STLSW6000HGC
Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €743.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000 HG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano 20 Stella?

There are not much differences between the two comparables