Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano FX?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
