Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 4010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-405
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €299.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4010
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Shimano Vanquish FC, 2500SC, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, VQ2500SC
Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €407.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500SC
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX stands out for a weight of 165g / 5,82oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Vanquish FC?

There are not much differences between the two comparables