Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the total score (7.52 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Delphin REDIX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX