Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
