Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
