Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
