Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
92.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €469.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
