Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the total score (7.52 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a durability of 7.69 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
