Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
