Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
