Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
