Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

75.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €198.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Ultegra

Spinning

85.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight180g / 6.35oz

Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €125.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2500SHGD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs and a ball bearings of 8, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Ultegra?

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX

6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.