Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (170g / 6oz) and total score (7.52 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
