Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
