Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in weight (195g / 6,88oz) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
