Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT, 2500D-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10480-255
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €204.30
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €48.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000 HGS
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?

There are not much differences between the two comparables