Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX edges out Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
