Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €471.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX edges out Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 145g / 5,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
