Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX and Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
