Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT, 2500D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10480-250
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €204.30
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Ultegra, C3000HGD, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, ULTC3000HGD
Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €132.00
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000HGD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX and Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Ultegra?

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.