Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
