Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
