Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX and Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X
