Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
