Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 800X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa TANACOM 800X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
