Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
