Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 145g / 5,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
