Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
