Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
