Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
