Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €218.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel