Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin YUPIE vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
