Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €471.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 145g / 5,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
