Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
