Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
