Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
