Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
