Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
