Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
