Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
