Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
