Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT, 4000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10480-405
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €218.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano Vanford FA, C2500SA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC2500SA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2500SA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Vanford FA?

There are not much differences between the two comparables