Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €218.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Vanford FA

Spinning

70.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000SDHA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.