Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
