Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
