Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
