Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.4 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
