Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
