Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
