Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin RAYA body


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
